Democracy is the best form of government

Churchill said "Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time." Essentially that democracy has many flaws and problems but all the others have more problems. Now authoritarian countries such as China are potentially challenging this assumption by proving that authoritarian regimes are better at creating economic growth. Is Democracy still the best form of government?


All the No points:


Democracy is the best form of government
Please cast your vote after you've read the arguments.
You can also add to the debate by leaving your comment at the end of the page.
(81%) (19%)

Democracy is the best form of government
Yes because...

Freedom

Democratic states nearly always have freer people than autocratic states. They obviously have the right to vote for their government so by extension deciding the policy of their nation and what their nation should be like. They have more freedom of speech and expression than in autocracies. In particular they are free to criticise their own government.

No because...

Except for the freedom to choose the government there is no reason why people cannot be as free under an autocracy as in a democracy.

Democracy is the best form of government
Yes because...

Represents the people

The biggest virtue of Democracy is that it is government by the people for the people. The government represents the views of the people who elect them and can throw them out if the government does things that the people do not like. Unlike other forms of government democracy is about the little man, everyone rather than the elite that are often disconnected from how everyone else lives their lives.

No because...

Democracy does not do very well at representing the people. In first past the post systems a government may not even have the support of a majority of those who voted not even including that many will not have votes and many more will not have the vote. This means that it is often a small minority of the population who determines which party gets in to government. Once they are there they are rarely representative of the people as they have several years to do what they like. Yes they need to think about re-election but that simply means they need to do more that the people like than the people dislike (or else have a good advertising campaign).

Democracy is the best form of government
Yes because...

Better governance due to transparency

Democracy is as much about having checks and balances to the executive and having transparency of decision-making as it is about elections and the populace throwing governments out of power. In a democracy the parliament, the media and sometimes the judiciary all keep an eye on the executive and what is being done with the people’s money. They are therefore able to see if the executive is doing things that are detrimental to the country, are immoral, or even illegal. This can then be brought to a halt. Even where such actions are not visible on the surface there are separate institutions that have the power to investigate the executive and watch any ‘secret’ deals or actions that are going on away from public view.

No because...

While this is mostly found in democracy it is not something that has to be exclusive to democracies. Autocracies can potentially be transparent and have checks and balances they however often do not simply because an autocracy often has the time, and the willingness to use force to prevent these from occurring.

Democracy is the best form of government
Yes because...

Respect of Human Rights

Democracy as much it is understood, is the government of the people, by the people and for the people.

If democracy is put at it appropriate performance, then, all facet of human rights is respected. The citizens would have the rights to exercise freedom of speech concerning the well-being of the populace in areas of the economy, education, health, infrastructural development, etc.

No because...

It is impossible for a state to accommodate all conflicting views on a subject. Thus, majority rule is practiced.
This puts the rights of minorities into jeopardy.

Democracy is the best form of government
Yes because...

Promotes Human Rights

As much as Democracy is understood, it is a government of the people, by the people and for the people. The ability of the people to have a voice in the running of the State, in the economy, health, education, infrastructural development, etc creates a bit-balanced environment for governance to thrive; this can only be achieved in a democratic governance.

No because...
Democracy is the best form of government
No because...

Economic growth

Autocracies are better at big projects, they can get things done and as such they are likely to be better at creating economic growth if they have the will. In an autocracy there are not the avenues for dissent that can block building projects, the police or troops can be used to clear protests that in the west would slow down large infrastructure projects. As a consequence of this all the infrastructure that is needed to create a modern economy can be produced quicker and cheaper than would be the case in a democracy. Also the resource base of the country can be accessed faster (no pesky environmentalists preventing drilling and mining!) and used more efficiently.

Yes because...

This is not the case. The most developed and richest countries are all democracies. While they may well have been developing their democracies during their initial industrialisation democracy and the freedom it brings is increasingly necessary for economic growth once the country has moved to being mostly dependent upon services rather than manufacturing or natural resource exploitation for economic growth. Once this occurs then creativity becomes important and the freedoms associated with democracy are needed to foster this creativity that is needed for industries such as information technology, creative arts, research and development etc.

Democracy is the best form of government
No because...

Increasingly about money

In some countries democracy seems to be increasingly about money. The U.S. is the obvious example where millions are spent on elections with big events and glitzy advertising campaigns. This is not what democracy should be about and it discourages other countries from moving along the path to democracy. Indeed it undermines the very idea of democracy. Democracy when money is involved to the extent that it is in the U.S.A. becomes elitist and corporatist because only the elite and rich businessmen can afford to fund the campaigns for congress let alone for the presidency. The 2008 campaign for the White House cost $1.6 billion and the whole 2008 election including senate and house of representatives races cost $5.3 billion. Autocracies obviously avoid this immense expense by avoiding elections.

Yes because...


Democracy is the best form of government

What do you think?
(81%) (19%)

Continue the Debate - Leave a Comment

19 Comments on "Democracy is the best form of government"


Arsha
September 26, 2012 5:41 pm

Democracy is the best form of govt. as it is based on discussions and opinions..

Arsha
September 26, 2012 5:43 pm

the thing you said is extremely correct…..

John Smith Jr
November 14, 2012 9:35 pm

Democracy is a method for taking decisions. Decisions are taken by voting. This has nothing to do with freedom. At this moment in time, there are no democracies on Earth where people are suppressed as slaves, but it is very well possible and well within reach. Simply put: two wolves and a sheep vote what they will have for dinner. That is the other face of democracy. The sheep has all the freedom to vote, right? Democracy is all about the majority. The minority has very little to say. Suppose that a muslim leader is elected in the USA and he turns the USA into a bad tyrant country and changes all the laws. I know that’s not gonna happen anytime soon, because much less than half of the population is muslim. But let’s just say that changes in the future (can you predict the future?) and about 50% of the population is muslim and votes for a muslim leader. In that case you have no right to complain, because it was a fair and free election. Although this was just an illustrative example, please don’t ever say “it’s not gonna happen anyway”. A hundred years ago, if you talked about walking on the surface of the moon, you would hear people say “Stop talking rubbish – moon landings are never going to happen anyway”. Want another disadvantage? Democratic countries have elections every now and than. Clinton didn’t want Guantanamo Bay. Bush did want it, and Obama doesn’t want it but can’t abolish it. What will the future bring for Guantanamo Bay? There is no long term planning because all leaders have different opinions. Long term planning is really needed when it comes to retirement laws/tax/deductions, mortgage laws etc. Just look at the national debt of a democratic country and you will see it only increases (not counting glitches), because democratic leaders make budget plans for the next year only. This means national debt will only increase and economic cuts will also increase when you have democracy. You choose for democracy, you choose for debts.

Speaker for Tribunocracy
May 8, 2013 9:31 pm

Most democracies are constitutional democracies that include protections for minorities or individuals that supersedes simple majority votes. Wolves having sheep for dinner would violate most democratic constitutions.

There is no empirical evidence that non democratic rule results in wiser decision making even for economic issues. Cuba and North Korea may not have big debts, but even if they suffered the “evil debts” of democracy it is clear they would economically be better of. Do you know a country without democracy that you think provides better lives, even just economically for its citizens as a whole?

Stephen Lucas
August 25, 2014 12:25 am

What about democracy as a “tyranny of the majority”? Obamacare, as an example, passed with no support from opposition party.

D-man
January 27, 2013 9:38 pm

democracy is the best.has any other form of government worked

tamizh
September 12, 2013 7:37 am

i think democracy is better than autocracy, but sometimes autocracy better than democracy. you see like many of them affected in the form of democracy. take an example of delhi student raped and murdered. autocratic country like china always maintain a GDP rate level high.

kk
February 3, 2013 10:29 am

but why autocracy is the bad? I don’t agree a bit here because sometimes power hungry leaders take advantages if it and mostly for developing countries autocracy is an ideal form of govt.

er
July 30, 2013 2:07 pm

democracy is good and bad both but i think more good . lets take an example , we the ppl of india are getting the right to vote !! right to freedom of speech and expressions . right to reside in a any part of the country .. !! isnt that a big thing DEMOCRACY IS BETTER THAN AUTOCRACY …

King
March 11, 2014 11:28 pm

i live in the U.S which has a democracy since day one they always say liberty and justice for all but manage to exterminate an entire race of people and keep another in a perpetual state of slavery for than a 100 years when they agreed to free them in 20 and then continue to deny them basic rights and liberties to this present day.

soni
October 16, 2013 10:39 am

it would have been worse with some other form of government.

Thinker123
October 26, 2013 8:05 pm

Maybe, but the monarch would have quick and absolute speed. No need to get the order constitutionilized; just send the army already! Democracy is obviously not the best form of government.

Thinker123
October 26, 2013 8:07 pm

This page is interesting. All the points are well stated, but democracy has obviously devolved into a worse government than it was intended to be.

Birdie Whinns
October 29, 2013 10:02 pm

I believe that there really is no better or worse form of government. It all really depends on the situation that the country is in. Take for example the in India. In a situation like that, autocracy would be the better form of government because they can act quickly. However, if you lived in an autocratic country where the citizens didn’t like what the leader was doing, too bad. It has the ability to keep doing what it was doing. In a democratic country, its the citizens who control the government.

Thinker123
October 30, 2013 4:33 am

Very true, yet Democracy is slowly falling away. The USA seems to be swallowed (very slowly) through medical services by Socialism, so is it better? It IS dying…

Anwesha
July 21, 2014 10:51 am

democracy is good and bad. if used properly its the best but if misused its the worst. currently its being extremely misused which is leading to security problems, corruption, economic loss etc. the good part is people can overthrow the govt. and they should do so if they feel the leaders are misusing their powers

Rahila Khan
July 10, 2016 7:31 pm

Because democracy is by the people for the people and of the people it means the power of the people

anusha
July 24, 2016 10:11 am

i understand democracy as something that gives weak same chance as the strong-mahatma gandhi

Davey boy
August 4, 2016 8:51 am

True democracy in my opinion is the best form of government, the trouble is a lot of so called democracies use a first post the post system which rarely gives a result reletive to what was voted for. Also countries should encourage participation by teaching children about civics and politics from an early age to increse enthusiasm. People should stop linking systems of government with economic success, I can make arguments both for and against as to whether democrocy is best in achieving this but regardless surely freedom to choose is the main benefit. Who in there right mind would want to live in a country where you have no input into how your country should be managed.

wpDiscuz
Debates > Democracy is the best form of government
Category: