Modified:
01 Dec 2009
by Admin

Vote totals:

Yes:

0%

No:

0%

Neutral:

0%

 
Subscribe to This Debate
You are not currently subscribed to this debate.


Subscribe to Newsletter
Tell a Friend
(Use commas to separate)
Bookmark and Share


DEBATE: ARE METATHERIANS INHERENTLY INFERIOR TO EUTHERIANS?

The current diversity of metatherians (marsupials) is much less than that of eutherian (placental) mammals. Is this due to inherent competitive inferiority in the former?





ARE METATHERIANS INHERENTLY INFERIOR TO EUTHERIANS?


Yes - Biogeography supports outcompetition


Metatherian fossils have been found throughout the world, but only remained diverse in South America and Australia until recently. Once the isthmus of Panamá formed and the Great American Biotic Interchange occurred, much of what had been a diverse marsupial metatherian assemblage - including hypercarnivores such as borhyaenids - in South America was replaced by placentals. Australia remained relatively isolated from eutherians, and this is why marsupials dominate the fauna today

Though Eutherians have caused the extinction of at least one notable marsupial - the Thylacine - in modern times and restricted the range of several others to Tasmania also.

Only the borhyaenids really went extinct with regards the South American metatherian radiation - caenolestids (shrew opossums), the monito del monte (Dromiciops - an Australodelphian), and didelphimorph opossums are still with us today. Borhyaenids probably went extinct just prior to GABI, due to climate change not outcompetition. Opossums even made in northward and now the range of Didelphis reaches as far as Canada.

Australia is not entirely isolated - placental species have made it across, but have not done as well as in other areas. Metatherian tree kangaroos also thrive in New Guinea, which has yet more placentals.


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Yes
Strongly Yes
Mostly Yes
Partially Yes
Neutral
Partially No
Mostly No
Strongly No
Absolutely No


Vote on the overall debate: Are metatherians inherently inferior to eutherians?

What do you think?  Vote on this debate below.
Absolutely Yes
Strongly Yes
Mostly Yes
Partially Yes
Neutral
Partially No
Mostly No
Strongly No
Absolutely No
1. Yes - Biogeography supports outcompetition
# 1

Metatherian fossils have been found throughout the world, but only remained diverse in South America and Australia until recently. Once the isthmus of Panamá formed and the Great American Biotic Interchange occurred, much of what had been a diverse marsupial metatherian assemblage - including hypercarnivores such as borhyaenids - in South America was replaced by placentals. Australia remained relatively isolated from eutherians, and this is why marsupials dominate the fauna today

admin

|

19:23, 28 April 09

|

Karma Score: 14


# 2

Only the borhyaenids really went extinct with regards the South American metatherian radiation - caenolestids (shrew opossums), the monito del monte (Dromiciops - an Australodelphian), and didelphimorph opossums are still with us today. Borhyaenids probably went extinct just prior to GABI, due to climate change not outcompetition. Opossums even made in northward and now the range of Didelphis reaches as far as Canada.

Australia is not entirely isolated - placental species have made it across, but have not done as well as in other areas. Metatherian tree kangaroos also thrive in New Guinea, which has yet more placentals.

admin

|

19:23, 28 April 09

|

Karma Score: 14



Loading...