Modified:
08 May 2009
by Admin

Vote totals:

Yes:

100%

No:

0%

Neutral:

0%

 
Subscribe to This Debate
You are not currently subscribed to this debate.


Subscribe to Newsletter
Tell a Friend
(Use commas to separate)
Bookmark and Share


DEBATE: THE EU SHOULD NOT INTRODUCE NEW EMPLOYMENT AND BUSINESS REGULATION FOR THE DURATION OF THE RECESSION.

EU regulation affects businesses in a number of areas, from employee rights to quality controls on goods produced. Would further regulation restrict businesses too much? And is business freedom what we need to get out off the recession?





THE EU SHOULD NOT INTRODUCE NEW EMPLOYMENT AND BUSINESS REGULATION FOR THE DURATION OF THE RECESSION.


New regulation hampers businesses


EU regulation generates costs for businesses. He extra time that must be spent on paperwork, the training that needs to bee provided for employees and of course the dreaded health and safety all add to the amount of time and money a business must spend on things other than production. These costs can have one of two effects. Either the business chooses not to pass the costs onto their customers in which case their profits fall, or they do pass the costs on which makes then less competitive. Neither of these things is good for an economy trying to escape a recession.



THE EU SHOULD NOT INTRODUCE NEW EMPLOYMENT AND BUSINESS REGULATION FOR THE DURATION OF THE RECESSION.


Thriving business is needed for economic recovery


To boost national economies we need to get capital circulating again. But if EU regulation is forcing prices up and profitability down this simply will not happen. In a recession customers are already nervous about parting with their money. The perception that prices are rising will not help this.



THE EU SHOULD NOT INTRODUCE NEW EMPLOYMENT AND BUSINESS REGULATION FOR THE DURATION OF THE RECESSION.


Public confidence


Now more than ever, the public needs reassurance that governing bodies like the EU are acting in their best financial interests. However, the perception will be that EU regulation is harmful to small businesses in particular, because of the increases in costs mentioned above. If the public believes that the EU is so out off touch that it is willing to harm the livelihoods of small business owners, how will they be trusted to lead us out of the recession?



THE EU SHOULD NOT INTRODUCE NEW EMPLOYMENT AND BUSINESS REGULATION FOR THE DURATION OF THE RECESSION.


Regulated business means stable economy


Now if ever is the time for increased regulation of businesses. Because the motivating factor for businesses is their own profit, they are unable to look at the bigger financial picture. If something is profitable for a business but bad for the economy as a whole, for example cutting employees’ wages to increase profit margins, a business would have no reason not to do it. A body such as the EU however can take an unbiased view of the economy and weigh up the need for profitability against factors like the need for workers to have disposable income. This will lead to a more stable economy in the long term because the interests of all the involved parties have been considered.



THE EU SHOULD NOT INTRODUCE NEW EMPLOYMENT AND BUSINESS REGULATION FOR THE DURATION OF THE RECESSION.


Stability is needed for long term recovery


Prior to the recession businesses seemed to be doing fairly well, so the government was willing to leave them alone. This success was predicated upon a healthy economy, and when this foundation was removed their unsound business models were revealed. If business regulation is halted it is possible that this will give businesses a short term boost. But because they will be desperately seeking short-term profitability this gives them a powerful incentive to use risky business models for a quick gain. But these models will not stand up to long-term scrutiny, so the cycle will begin again. EU regulation will create a system where high risk strategies are not profitable so will lead to business models which are more likely to be long-term sustainable.




Vote on the overall debate: The EU should not introduce new employment and business regulation for the duration of the recession.

What do you think?  Vote on this debate below.
Absolutely Yes
Strongly Yes
Mostly Yes
Partially Yes
Neutral
Partially No
Mostly No
Strongly No
Absolutely No
1. New regulation hampers businesses
# 1

EU regulation generates costs for businesses. He extra time that must be spent on paperwork, the training that needs to bee provided for employees and of course the dreaded health and safety all add to the amount of time and money a business must spend on things other than production. These costs can have one of two effects. Either the business chooses not to pass the costs onto their customers in which case their profits fall, or they do pass the costs on which makes then less competitive. Neither of these things is good for an economy trying to escape a recession.

admin

|

10:57, 20 April 09

|

Karma Score: 14



2. Thriving business is needed for economic recovery
# 1

To boost national economies we need to get capital circulating again. But if EU regulation is forcing prices up and profitability down this simply will not happen. In a recession customers are already nervous about parting with their money. The perception that prices are rising will not help this.

admin

|

10:57, 20 April 09

|

Karma Score: 14



3. Public confidence
# 1

Now more than ever, the public needs reassurance that governing bodies like the EU are acting in their best financial interests. However, the perception will be that EU regulation is harmful to small businesses in particular, because of the increases in costs mentioned above. If the public believes that the EU is so out off touch that it is willing to harm the livelihoods of small business owners, how will they be trusted to lead us out of the recession?

admin

|

10:58, 20 April 09

|

Karma Score: 14



1. Regulated business means stable economy
# 1

Now if ever is the time for increased regulation of businesses. Because the motivating factor for businesses is their own profit, they are unable to look at the bigger financial picture. If something is profitable for a business but bad for the economy as a whole, for example cutting employees’ wages to increase profit margins, a business would have no reason not to do it. A body such as the EU however can take an unbiased view of the economy and weigh up the need for profitability against factors like the need for workers to have disposable income. This will lead to a more stable economy in the long term because the interests of all the involved parties have been considered.

admin

|

10:59, 20 April 09

|

Karma Score: 14



2. Stability is needed for long term recovery
# 1

Prior to the recession businesses seemed to be doing fairly well, so the government was willing to leave them alone. This success was predicated upon a healthy economy, and when this foundation was removed their unsound business models were revealed. If business regulation is halted it is possible that this will give businesses a short term boost. But because they will be desperately seeking short-term profitability this gives them a powerful incentive to use risky business models for a quick gain. But these models will not stand up to long-term scrutiny, so the cycle will begin again. EU regulation will create a system where high risk strategies are not profitable so will lead to business models which are more likely to be long-term sustainable.

admin

|

11:00, 20 April 09

|

Karma Score: 14



Loading...