British MEPs should put the interests of white Britons above all other people living in the country.

Current version: 14 May 2009 | 14:02 | admin

<< Older version | Newer version >>

All versions

Key

  • Text coloured Greenhas been added snce the previous version
  • Text marked red and striked-throughhas been deleted

Yes, because... Majority rules. That’s democracy.

 

Within any community there will be separate groups with distinct needs which leads to conflicts of interest, because what is beneficial for one group could potentially be detrimental to another. For example, allocating funds will always require a careful balancing up of the interests of the groups involved and the funds will be spent in the way that benefits the most people. MEPs are under pressure from countless community and ethnic groups within their constituencies to promote their interests within the European Parliament. The MEP will have to weigh up the beneficial effects of promoting the interests of any of those groups against the possible detriment faced by others. By far the largest ethnic group in this country is white Britons, so MEPs have a duty to promote their interests as it will have the greatest beneficial effect. This is not racist, it is utilitarian.

 

Although the state tries to do the best for the most people, it does not do this at the expense of the rights of minorities. Minority rights form a base level, above which utilitarian principles can be enacted but never at the cost of denying someone else their basic rights. Representation by an elected official is one of these basic rights. The assumption should never be made that all white Britons have the same interests, or that all minorities will have opposing ones. The divide between races is an imaginary one. All people must be considered equally, some are not more equal than others.