Modified:
16 Feb 2009
by Admin

Vote totals:

Yes:

100%

No:

0%

Neutral:

0%

 
Subscribe to This Debate
You are not currently subscribed to this debate.


Subscribe to Newsletter
Tell a Friend
(Use commas to separate)
Bookmark and Share


DEBATE: VALENTINES DAY IS JUST A HALLMARK PLOY

The 14th of February is a date which annually brings around equal measure of love and cynicism, with some couples seeing it as a welcome time to joyfully celebrate their union, and others as a coercive social convention which could be done without. Is St.Valentines Day a cunning capitalist scheme or something with a lot more heart behind it?





VALENTINES DAY IS JUST A HALLMARK PLOY


Dependable payday for businesses


Due to the idea of Valentines Day being ingrained in our consciences as a day where we must celebrate our partners, it represents a reliable income stream for card companies and other businesses. For example, in 2006, $13.9 billion worth of chocolate and cocoa products were shipped into the USA (1). Thus it could be argued that the occasion represents a chance for capitalism to prosper, using the pretence as love as a vehicle to make money

(1)http://www.nbc-2.com/articles/readarticle.asp?articleid=25964&z=3

Whilst Valentines Day does provide a big payday for many companies, this is not necessarily a totally negative thing. For one, it helps to ensure consumer spending which aids the general health of national economies – never more of a concern than now. It also helps to bring money into developing countries, who have become dependant on the 14th of February to keep their economies stable - ‘South American countries…export huge quantities of flowers on the occasion of Valentine's Day’ (1)

(1)http://www.theydeserveit.com/valentines-day/valentin es-day-facts.html


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Yes
Strongly Yes
Mostly Yes
Partially Yes
Neutral
Partially No
Mostly No
Strongly No
Absolutely No

VALENTINES DAY IS JUST A HALLMARK PLOY


Widening of Valentines Day market in recent years


In recent times, the idea of single people being able to enjoy Valentines Day has been more prominent. Many clubs and bars now offer singles nights on Valentines Day to help people meet partners, through schemes like speed dating. It may be cynical but some may claim this is an attempt by businesses to widen their Valentines Day market, cashing in on the misery of singletons by pressuring them not to be alone.

The obvious counter to this is that such occasions may actually present a good opportunity for singles looking for a partner to meet someone like-minded. Money making scheme or not, someone who finds their ‘soul mate’ on a Valentines night out isn’t going to complain.


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Yes
Strongly Yes
Mostly Yes
Partially Yes
Neutral
Partially No
Mostly No
Strongly No
Absolutely No

VALENTINES DAY IS JUST A HALLMARK PLOY


Valentines Day may offend Hindu and Muslim values just to make money


In 2003, there were mass protests in India and Pakistan about the exporting of Valentines Day to their countries. The right-wing Shiv Sena group argued that the occasion encouraged lustful behaviour by the youth, undercutting traditional values for the benefit for Western businesses (1). Surely attempting to market Valentines Day to cultures which may take great offence from its messages illustrates the ugly greed of the modern concept.

(1)http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/2749 667.stm



VALENTINES DAY IS JUST A HALLMARK PLOY


The title of the day is based on a common error


Whilst the idea of St. Valentines Day as a day of love is long established, it is actually based on a basic misconception. It is in fact St. Raphael who is the ‘patron saint for happy encounters’ (1) and not St. Valentine. This is a fact commonly accepted within the Church, but something which most people are ignorant to. Seeing then as the day is based on a falsity, surely its credibility as a genuine celebration of loving union is damaged. Perhaps a 19th century marketing department decided ‘Valentine’ had a nicer ring to it than ‘Raphael’…

(1)http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7888539.stm



VALENTINES DAY IS JUST A HALLMARK PLOY


The tradition is longstanding - predating modern capitalism


Since the Middle Ages, the 14th of February has been celebrated as a day of romantic love - with Geoffrey Chaucer a notable advocate. Thus the tradition predates even the printing press, and is not merely a feature of modern capitalism, even if that is how it is now viewed.



VALENTINES DAY IS JUST A HALLMARK PLOY


The spirit of the celebration is not based on spending


The idea of a special day on which couples can unite and spend time together is healthy in our busy, modern lives. In a survey of 1017 people, 90% said that they would prefer a day’s worth of undivided attention from their partner to a token gift (1). This surely illustrates that the majority of people see the day as an opportunity to spend quality time with their significant other, rather than being an opportunity to be showered in lavish gifts.

(1)http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALe qM5hViTJdmsXhPMsFlcsVme7JLj0gAQ



VALENTINES DAY IS JUST A HALLMARK PLOY


Much of the snobbery about Valentines Day comes from those who have no-one to spend it with


Valentines Day is a topic that always excites debate because it can be an emotional time for those who are single and unhappy in that situation. Whilst criticism certainly isn’t exclusive to those who are single, one can see why cynical sentiments would be likely to arise from those who can’t really enjoy the occasion. By painting the day as a capitalist sham, frustrated singletons may gain some satisfaction by cheapening the experience for others.




Vote on the overall debate: Valentines Day is just a Hallmark ploy

What do you think?  Vote on this debate below.
Absolutely Yes
Strongly Yes
Mostly Yes
Partially Yes
Neutral
Partially No
Mostly No
Strongly No
Absolutely No
1. Dependable payday for businesses
# 1

Due to the idea of Valentines Day being ingrained in our consciences as a day where we must celebrate our partners, it represents a reliable income stream for card companies and other businesses. For example, in 2006, $13.9 billion worth of chocolate and cocoa products were shipped into the USA (1). Thus it could be argued that the occasion represents a chance for capitalism to prosper, using the pretence as love as a vehicle to make money

(1)http://www.nbc-2.com/articles/readarticle.asp?articleid=25964&z=3

admin

|

08:17, 16 February 09

|

Karma Score: 14


# 2

Whilst Valentines Day does provide a big payday for many companies, this is not necessarily a totally negative thing. For one, it helps to ensure consumer spending which aids the general health of national economies – never more of a concern than now. It also helps to bring money into developing countries, who have become dependant on the 14th of February to keep their economies stable - ‘South American countries…export huge quantities of flowers on the occasion of Valentine's Day’ (1)

(1)http://www.theydeserveit.com/valentines-day/valentin es-day-facts.html

admin

|

08:17, 16 February 09

|

Karma Score: 14



2. Widening of Valentines Day market in recent years
# 1

In recent times, the idea of single people being able to enjoy Valentines Day has been more prominent. Many clubs and bars now offer singles nights on Valentines Day to help people meet partners, through schemes like speed dating. It may be cynical but some may claim this is an attempt by businesses to widen their Valentines Day market, cashing in on the misery of singletons by pressuring them not to be alone.

admin

|

08:17, 16 February 09

|

Karma Score: 14


# 2

The obvious counter to this is that such occasions may actually present a good opportunity for singles looking for a partner to meet someone like-minded. Money making scheme or not, someone who finds their ‘soul mate’ on a Valentines night out isn’t going to complain.

admin

|

08:17, 16 February 09

|

Karma Score: 14



3. Valentines Day may offend Hindu and Muslim values just to make money
# 1

In 2003, there were mass protests in India and Pakistan about the exporting of Valentines Day to their countries. The right-wing Shiv Sena group argued that the occasion encouraged lustful behaviour by the youth, undercutting traditional values for the benefit for Western businesses (1). Surely attempting to market Valentines Day to cultures which may take great offence from its messages illustrates the ugly greed of the modern concept.

(1)http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/2749 667.stm

admin

|

08:18, 16 February 09

|

Karma Score: 14



4. The title of the day is based on a common error
# 1

Whilst the idea of St. Valentines Day as a day of love is long established, it is actually based on a basic misconception. It is in fact St. Raphael who is the ‘patron saint for happy encounters’ (1) and not St. Valentine. This is a fact commonly accepted within the Church, but something which most people are ignorant to. Seeing then as the day is based on a falsity, surely its credibility as a genuine celebration of loving union is damaged. Perhaps a 19th century marketing department decided ‘Valentine’ had a nicer ring to it than ‘Raphael’…

(1)http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7888539.stm

admin

|

08:19, 16 February 09

|

Karma Score: 14



1. The tradition is longstanding - predating modern capitalism
# 1

Since the Middle Ages, the 14th of February has been celebrated as a day of romantic love - with Geoffrey Chaucer a notable advocate. Thus the tradition predates even the printing press, and is not merely a feature of modern capitalism, even if that is how it is now viewed.

admin

|

08:25, 16 February 09

|

Karma Score: 14



2. The spirit of the celebration is not based on spending
# 1

The idea of a special day on which couples can unite and spend time together is healthy in our busy, modern lives. In a survey of 1017 people, 90% said that they would prefer a day’s worth of undivided attention from their partner to a token gift (1). This surely illustrates that the majority of people see the day as an opportunity to spend quality time with their significant other, rather than being an opportunity to be showered in lavish gifts.

(1)http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALe qM5hViTJdmsXhPMsFlcsVme7JLj0gAQ

admin

|

08:26, 16 February 09

|

Karma Score: 14



3. Much of the snobbery about Valentines Day comes from those who have no-one to spend it with
# 1

Valentines Day is a topic that always excites debate because it can be an emotional time for those who are single and unhappy in that situation. Whilst criticism certainly isn’t exclusive to those who are single, one can see why cynical sentiments would be likely to arise from those who can’t really enjoy the occasion. By painting the day as a capitalist sham, frustrated singletons may gain some satisfaction by cheapening the experience for others.

admin

|

08:27, 16 February 09

|

Karma Score: 14



Loading...