Should India be allowed to import atomic energy technology without signing the Non-Proliferation Treaty?

Current version: 10 Sep 2008 | 09:28 | admin

<< Older version | Newer version >>

All versions

Key

  • Text coloured Greenhas been added snce the previous version
  • Text marked red and striked-throughhas been deleted

Yes, because... • There would be greater business opportunities

 

The waiver would provide some nations with the opportunity to do more business with India. France, Russia, Canada, Brazil and South Africa are in favour of an agreement. It is thought that there will be three meetings before an agreement is made, but at the end of the day, an agreement will be made, in the interests of business, and that it is just a question of how long till an agreement is made. Without the exemption, business would suffer as The Nuclear Suppliers Group's approval of an exemption to its rules is essential for finalizing the civil nuclear cooperation deal.

 

Making exemptions to international treaties on the basis of business interests is in flagrant disregard of the necessity of strong global standards in the process of non-proliferation. In particular, making this exception with India is incredibly irresponsible: this is a nation which has failed to co-operate with international movements towards non-proliferation for decades, and as a major world economy this move towards providing it with the technology is evident of the ability of the world's largest nations to flout the rules.