Modified:
08 Oct 2008
by Admin

Vote totals:

Yes:

33%

No:

67%

Neutral:

0%

 
Subscribe to This Debate
You are not currently subscribed to this debate.


Subscribe to Newsletter
Tell a Friend
(Use commas to separate)
Bookmark and Share


DEBATE: VOTING FOR MAYOR OF LONDON SHOULD NOT BE EXPANDED TO THOSE WHO WORK IN LONDON

As a resident of the London area, I have the right to Vote in the Mayor of London elections, which gives me a say in the running of the capital city, including transport. Should those who work in London on a daily basis, yet are forced to live on the suburbs (not included in the election) by high house prices have a say in the mayoral election?





VOTING FOR MAYOR OF LONDON SHOULD NOT BE EXPANDED TO THOSE WHO WORK IN LONDON


Living in London and paying London house prices entitles me to vote more than those who live outside London


In living in London, one pays higher house prices, higher council tax and the cost of overall living. I am also resigned to the fact that London transport is really the only way to travel in London, due to heavy congestion. Therefore, seeing as transport for London is my only option, and I live in the London area, I should have more say in its running than those who live outside London, even if only marginally.

Many people who use public transport in London live outside the city. They pay their taxes and their fares, yet they have no say on how this essential piece of infrastructure is run.


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Yes
Strongly Yes
Mostly Yes
Partially Yes
Neutral
Partially No
Mostly No
Strongly No
Absolutely No

VOTING FOR MAYOR OF LONDON SHOULD NOT BE EXPANDED TO THOSE WHO WORK IN LONDON


Transport for London affects Londoners more


If you live in London you are resigned to the fact you have to use public transport due to congestion. Therefore, since I am being forced to use it ALL the time, I should have more say in its running than those who only use it for commuting purposes.

If Londoners use public transport more it will only be marginally so. And if Oyster card season ticket holders use the facilities at the weekend they do so effectively for free as travel at the weekends is included in the price of their weekly ticket.

Since people who live outside London pay the same as those who live in London we could make the argument that people who commute should have more say over those who live here since they get to experience fewer benefits.


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Yes
Strongly Yes
Mostly Yes
Partially Yes
Neutral
Partially No
Mostly No
Strongly No
Absolutely No

VOTING FOR MAYOR OF LONDON SHOULD NOT BE EXPANDED TO THOSE WHO WORK IN LONDON


If those who only commute into London get the vote, it reduces the vote of those who pay to Live in London


If the vote for London mayor is given to those who commute into London it reduces the power of the vote for those who pay to live in London, and use it every day, and not just weekdays.



VOTING FOR MAYOR OF LONDON SHOULD NOT BE EXPANDED TO THOSE WHO WORK IN LONDON


Taxi drivers who live outside London should have a Vote


Taxi drivers get enough benefit from being able to drive in bus lanes (how on earth was this ever decided anyway? What makes taxis some kind service which should benefit from privileges given to busses and cyclists?), the fact they ply their trade here should give them no more rights than anyone else who works in London.

Taxi drivers are substantially affected by the running of the city. Mayors impose sanctions and restrictions on their prices, fares, and carbon emissions converters. Surely those whose livelihood is sustained by the city they work in, and whose work is directly affected by the mayor, should have a vote in the mayoral election.


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Yes
Strongly Yes
Mostly Yes
Partially Yes
Neutral
Partially No
Mostly No
Strongly No
Absolutely No

VOTING FOR MAYOR OF LONDON SHOULD NOT BE EXPANDED TO THOSE WHO WORK IN LONDON


Those who commute to London have to pay the same fares as set by the Mayor of London


Those who commute into London to work, have to pay the same fares as those who live in London. Yet only those who live in the London area are entitled to the vote for mayor, giving them a say in how Transport for London is run. Shouldn't those who are forced to use the travel in order to work in London have a say in the running of something they use on almost a daily basis?




Vote on the overall debate: Voting for Mayor of London should not be expanded to those who work in London

What do you think?  Vote on this debate below.
Absolutely Yes
Strongly Yes
Mostly Yes
Partially Yes
Neutral
Partially No
Mostly No
Strongly No
Absolutely No
1. Living in London and paying London house prices entitles me to vote more than those who live outside London
# 1

In living in London, one pays higher house prices, higher council tax and the cost of overall living. I am also resigned to the fact that London transport is really the only way to travel in London, due to heavy congestion. Therefore, seeing as transport for London is my only option, and I live in the London area, I should have more say in its running than those who live outside London, even if only marginally.

dhc

|

09:14, 13 May 08

|

Karma Score: 1367


# 2

Many people who use public transport in London live outside the city. They pay their taxes and their fares, yet they have no say on how this essential piece of infrastructure is run.

dhc

|

09:14, 13 May 08

|

Karma Score: 1367



2. Transport for London affects Londoners more
# 1

If you live in London you are resigned to the fact you have to use public transport due to congestion. Therefore, since I am being forced to use it ALL the time, I should have more say in its running than those who only use it for commuting purposes.

dhc

|

09:17, 13 May 08

|

Karma Score: 1367


# 2

If Londoners use public transport more it will only be marginally so. And if Oyster card season ticket holders use the facilities at the weekend they do so effectively for free as travel at the weekends is included in the price of their weekly ticket.

Since people who live outside London pay the same as those who live in London we could make the argument that people who commute should have more say over those who live here since they get to experience fewer benefits.

dhc

|

09:17, 13 May 08

|

Karma Score: 1367



3. If those who only commute into London get the vote, it reduces the vote of those who pay to Live in London
# 1

If the vote for London mayor is given to those who commute into London it reduces the power of the vote for those who pay to live in London, and use it every day, and not just weekdays.

dhc

|

09:22, 13 May 08

|

Karma Score: 1367



1. Taxi drivers who live outside London should have a Vote
# 1

Taxi drivers are substantially affected by the running of the city. Mayors impose sanctions and restrictions on their prices, fares, and carbon emissions converters. Surely those whose livelihood is sustained by the city they work in, and whose work is directly affected by the mayor, should have a vote in the mayoral election.

dhc

|

09:26, 13 May 08

|

Karma Score: 1367


# 2

Taxi drivers get enough benefit from being able to drive in bus lanes (how on earth was this ever decided anyway? What makes taxis some kind service which should benefit from privileges given to busses and cyclists?), the fact they ply their trade here should give them no more rights than anyone else who works in London.

dhc

|

09:26, 13 May 08

|

Karma Score: 1367



2. Those who commute to London have to pay the same fares as set by the Mayor of London
# 1

Those who commute into London to work, have to pay the same fares as those who live in London. Yet only those who live in the London area are entitled to the vote for mayor, giving them a say in how Transport for London is run. Shouldn't those who are forced to use the travel in order to work in London have a say in the running of something they use on almost a daily basis?

dhc

|

09:29, 13 May 08

|

Karma Score: 1367



Loading...