Modified:
09 Jan 2010
by Admin

Vote totals:

Yes:

60%

No:

20%

Neutral:

20%

 
Subscribe to This Debate
You are not currently subscribed to this debate.


Subscribe to Newsletter
Tell a Friend
(Use commas to separate)
Bookmark and Share


DEBATE: RELIGIONS SHOULD NOT QUALIFY AS CHARITIES

Currently in both the US and Britain churches and other religious organisations qualify for charitable status. Why?





RELIGIONS SHOULD NOT QUALIFY AS CHARITIES


What benefit do churches or religious organisations really provide?


An organisation is set up which dupes people into giving it money, persuades them of various extremely dubious and unscientific premises about the world, and you therefore give it a tax break. Something about that situation seems wrong to me.

Religions and religious organisations do considerable charity work. Plus, they have a generally beneficial effect on society: why not assist that?


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Yes
Strongly Yes
Mostly Yes
Partially Yes
Neutral
Partially No
Mostly No
Strongly No
Absolutely No

RELIGIONS SHOULD NOT QUALIFY AS CHARITIES


The money could be spent elsewhere


Admittedly some religions do undertake charitable work. However they inevitably also waste at least some of their money on 'glorifying' a being/beings who is/are supposedly omnipotent and therefore quite capable of 'glorifying' himself/themselves. Why not spend it on charities, schools or hospitals which are far more likely to spend 100% of the money on something more useful than cassocks.




Vote on the overall debate: Religions should not qualify as charities

What do you think?  Vote on this debate below.
Absolutely Yes
Strongly Yes
Mostly Yes
Partially Yes
Neutral
Partially No
Mostly No
Strongly No
Absolutely No
1. What benefit do churches or religious organisations really provide?
# 1

An organisation is set up which dupes people into giving it money, persuades them of various extremely dubious and unscientific premises about the world, and you therefore give it a tax break. Something about that situation seems wrong to me.

dhc

|

17:02, 08 May 08

|

Karma Score: 1367


# 2

Religions and religious organisations do considerable charity work. Plus, they have a generally beneficial effect on society: why not assist that?

dhc

|

17:02, 08 May 08

|

Karma Score: 1367



2. The money could be spent elsewhere
# 1

Admittedly some religions do undertake charitable work. However they inevitably also waste at least some of their money on 'glorifying' a being/beings who is/are supposedly omnipotent and therefore quite capable of 'glorifying' himself/themselves. Why not spend it on charities, schools or hospitals which are far more likely to spend 100% of the money on something more useful than cassocks.

dhc

|

17:09, 08 May 08

|

Karma Score: 1367



Loading...