The main issue I find with Evolution is poor science - period. All the "scientific proof" which is laid out in the open is only possible in a reality which is built ultimately on guesswork and assuming a particular set of scenarios.

There are extremely fundamental questions which thwart the very thought of the theory of Evolution but which are ignored each and every day by those fighting to keep this decadent imaginary fairy tale alive.

In years from now the human race will look back at the theory of Evolution and shake their heads in disbelief at the sheer idiocy of it all.

I am not saying that I have the answer to life on planet Earth, or the Universe for that matter, but I can sure see where it ain't.

The theory of Evolution is also useless. Tell me how we can benefit from a theory which delivers to us never-ending conflict and confusion where chaos rules the day and where only death and torment can benefit us!?

But yes, those who believe in the theory of Evolution have all these incredibly "scientific" reasoning's which they will tell us is just too complex for anyone but the most brilliant minds to comprehend. The irony is that their definition of a 'brilliant mind' is one that comprehends and accepts their alternate reality of Evolution.

Evolution is on the stand not any other theory, including Creationism, since Evolution is the theory being pushed around the globe as Science and Creationism is not.

Here is a pretty good batch of issues that Evolution has to deal with before it is anything more than another religion in a world with too many to begin with. http://ldolphin.org/wmwilliams.html

You might say it's outdated and bring up all kinds of excuses for why the material presented there is "lame" because the author is obviously a religious man etc, but the fact remains that until you Evolutionists prove by all scientific methods that Evolution can surmount these obstacles, your are all just as idiotic and naive as you claim the non-Evolutionists to be.

I have been to several Evolution vs Non-Evolution debates and was dumbfounded after finding that in none of the debates did the Evolutionists attack the points that the other side made and put them to rest. Instead they dodged the points and rambled on about something that they wished was sufficient proof, only to have the opposition bring up some major flaws or doubts with their "proof" which made the Evolutionists look stumped and who then turned to generalizations and looping over and over again. Really nuts!

Why is it that Evolutionists are not the ones challenging the opposition? If Evolution is so solid in it's foundation and "overwhelming scientific evidence" why are the Evolutionists not attacking the naysayers?

And then people in the Evolution communities will say things like "Go get educated before you talk about Evolution". What they really mean to say is "I will not see you as being educated until you have gone through all the Evolutionist jargon and speak our speak and walk our walk ... and till basically you are in agreement with us... ". As i said, your definition of intelligent is someone who accepts the theory of Evolution as you do, or at the very least does not fight it!