Modified:
07 Feb 2010
by Admin

Vote totals:

Yes:

60%

No:

40%

Neutral:

0%

 
Subscribe to This Debate
You are not currently subscribed to this debate.


Subscribe to Newsletter
Tell a Friend
(Use commas to separate)
Bookmark and Share


DEBATE: WHETHER ALL DRUGS SHOULD BE LEGALISED

The 'War Against Drugs' has been going on in the country for years; we have been taught from a young age that drugs are terrible, debilitating and life-destroying things, but have the government ever given serious consideration to the saying "Keep your friends close and your enemies closer" in regards to drugs? Have they even realised the exceptional benefits this country could potentially go through with the legalisation of ALL drugs of all classes?





WHETHER ALL DRUGS SHOULD BE LEGALISED


The legalisation of drugs would remove much of the "coolness" of using them


Kids and young adults smoke weed, take ecstasy, attempt cocaine much of the time because its viewed of as "cool;" because its a big 'fuck you' to possibly their friends, their family, or typically the establishment, because they know its illegal, and they know therefore they can get in big trouble. It's risky, it's sexy, it's illegal. By legalising drugs a great amount of that would be taken away and people would be less inclined to try it simply because it wouldn't be cool; imagine picking up some coke from your corner shop on a Tuesday afternoon?

This process would take a fair number of years for its effects to be noticed. The drugs would still carry their stigma and attached "coolness" for a while.


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Yes
Strongly Yes
Mostly Yes
Partially Yes
Neutral
Partially No
Mostly No
Strongly No
Absolutely No

WHETHER ALL DRUGS SHOULD BE LEGALISED


By legalising drugs, there would be a legal standard as to the quality of the substance.


When you read about unfortunate members of the public having an adverse reaction to drugs- some even die from their usage, this is often a result of the crap that drugs are cut with in order to make the long line of dealers rich. Pure drugs may be smuggled into the country, but dealers cut it with other substances; bleach, talc etc all in order to make more money from the larger amount that they now posses having added things. If the British government were to legalise drugs, there would have to be a standard as to the purity of the drugs, and therefore people will be safer with drugs and less likely to die or become seriously ill.

Drug users used to a product cut with something to increase the volume may be liable to accidentally overdose on the purer, licensed version. A legal standard will not be able to stop people cashing in by manufacturing their own drugs and it will be difficult to police the quality of these products. All drugs (including legal and medicinal ones) carry a risk of an adverse reaction, so plenty of people will still die from using them.


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Yes
Strongly Yes
Mostly Yes
Partially Yes
Neutral
Partially No
Mostly No
Strongly No
Absolutely No

WHETHER ALL DRUGS SHOULD BE LEGALISED


The Amount of tax that the government could place on drugs would bring the NHS out of its neverending slump.


It is possible to argue that with the legalisation of all drugs, people that never considered taking them would try them, and possibly become addicted. But, as argued in a separate point much of the coolness would be taken away. One of the major benefits to legalisation would be the enormous amount of tax that could be put on the legal, and purer substances. The NHS would not struggle with an overflow of drug addicts; the money made in tax would cover not only improvements in hospitals, but also improvements in education making training to become a nurse or practitioner a far more achievable vocation, improving livelihoods and therefore the economy. There will always be drugs; the War on Drugs is lost, why not have the state make money out of it too?

If drugs were legal and more easily accessible then the NHS would have to spend even more money treating the health problems that they cause. At the moment, the NHS concentrates on programmes to help people break out of drug addiction, like the provision of methodone. However, if drug use became legal they would have less of an incentive to do so, meaning that more people would suffer the ill health that results from long term drug use.


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Yes
Strongly Yes
Mostly Yes
Partially Yes
Neutral
Partially No
Mostly No
Strongly No
Absolutely No

WHETHER ALL DRUGS SHOULD BE LEGALISED


The amount of illegal activity associated with smuggling would come to a halt.


If drugs were legally imported in, as many brands of cigarettes and alcohol are, what become of the smuggling business? It would decrease incredibly if not eliminated by the fact that drugs are available legally. Why wants to go down a dark alley to meet an almost stranger and buy drugs cut with crap, when it's possible to buy them as one would cigarettes?



WHETHER ALL DRUGS SHOULD BE LEGALISED


Drugs education could be true and accurate instead of falsely terrifying.


School drugs education is typically biased towards explaining the dangers of drugs and against describing any potential benefits or advantages. All drugs are treated as dangerous and to be avoided. Children who try cannabis, for example, quickly stop believing anything they are told because they find cannabis enjoyable and relaxing. If drugs were legal, education could be truthful and explain the real advantages and dangers of drug use. Even better it might promote the sensible use of drugs instead of encouraging more abuse.

Schools spend lots of time trying to educate young people about sexual and health issues in the hope that they will look after themselves and be safer. Yet in reality, the problems of obesity, teenage pregnancy and STDs continue to escalate. Why should we expect drugs to be any different- a more 'balanced' education programme would not be enough to stop drug abuse, especially when we take the addictive nature of drugs into consideration.


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Yes
Strongly Yes
Mostly Yes
Partially Yes
Neutral
Partially No
Mostly No
Strongly No
Absolutely No

WHETHER ALL DRUGS SHOULD BE LEGALISED


Laws Against Drugs Use Are There For A Reason!


People have been taking drugs, which our government deems illegal, for as long as there have been people. 11 million people take illegal drugs in the UK, despite their being illegal.

The government justifies drugs laws with two main arguments: cost and health.

The government tells us that drugs crime costs the tax payer £16 billion per year. If we look at where this money is spent we find that the majority of the expense comes from the fact that drugs are illegal. It is spent on paying the Police to arrest people on drugs charges, it is spent on paying the court service to hear the trials and it is spent on paying the prison service to keep people in prison. If we were to repeal the misuse of drugs act 1971 and replace it with a system of regulation, education and quality control the tax payer would save £16 billion per year.

The government paints a picture of illegal drugs beign evil and bad for our health although 11 million people manage to take illegal drugs in this country. The greatest health risks come from the fact that there is no regulation of the system, there is no education as to safe methods of use and there is no quality control.

Alcohol and tobacco are proven to be more harmful to health than many illegal drugs (there are too many to mention individually here).

The example set in countries such as Holland shows that legalising drugs does not mean that the country will grind to a halt while everyone has a go. It does not change peoples attitudes towards them, similarly some people choose not to drink alcohol or smoke tobacco, some do, legality is not an issue here.

Cannabis, for example, is proven to have many health benefits. It is proven to help relieve the symptoms of chronic pain, arthritis, spinal chord injuries, glaucoma and parkinsons to name but a few.

For the reasons given above, drugs laws do not work and never will.

Getting rid of laws against drug use would be idiotic. The majority of people agree with drug laws and like it or not, they work! If a Government suddenly got rid of drug use laws, imagine what message the message people would get from this. People would view this as a green light to take drugs.


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Yes
Strongly Yes
Mostly Yes
Partially Yes
Neutral
Partially No
Mostly No
Strongly No
Absolutely No

WHETHER ALL DRUGS SHOULD BE LEGALISED


A Drugs Economy


As a result of the legalisation of drug use, an economy of drugs trafficking and creation would result. Countries which already have drugs problems would be encouraged to mass produce and traffic drugs to Britain, despite it most likely being illegal in their own country.




Vote on the overall debate: Whether All Drugs Should be Legalised

What do you think?  Vote on this debate below.
Absolutely Yes
Strongly Yes
Mostly Yes
Partially Yes
Neutral
Partially No
Mostly No
Strongly No
Absolutely No
1. The legalisation of drugs would remove much of the "coolness" of using them
# 1

Kids and young adults smoke weed, take ecstasy, attempt cocaine much of the time because its viewed of as "cool;" because its a big 'fuck you' to possibly their friends, their family, or typically the establishment, because they know its illegal, and they know therefore they can get in big trouble. It's risky, it's sexy, it's illegal. By legalising drugs a great amount of that would be taken away and people would be less inclined to try it simply because it wouldn't be cool; imagine picking up some coke from your corner shop on a Tuesday afternoon?

dhc

|

15:55, 16 April 08

|

Karma Score: 1367


# 2

This process would take a fair number of years for its effects to be noticed. The drugs would still carry their stigma and attached "coolness" for a while.

dhc

|

15:55, 16 April 08

|

Karma Score: 1367



2. By legalising drugs, there would be a legal standard as to the quality of the substance.
# 1

When you read about unfortunate members of the public having an adverse reaction to drugs- some even die from their usage, this is often a result of the crap that drugs are cut with in order to make the long line of dealers rich. Pure drugs may be smuggled into the country, but dealers cut it with other substances; bleach, talc etc all in order to make more money from the larger amount that they now posses having added things. If the British government were to legalise drugs, there would have to be a standard as to the purity of the drugs, and therefore people will be safer with drugs and less likely to die or become seriously ill.

dhc

|

16:07, 16 April 08

|

Karma Score: 1367


# 2

Drug users used to a product cut with something to increase the volume may be liable to accidentally overdose on the purer, licensed version. A legal standard will not be able to stop people cashing in by manufacturing their own drugs and it will be difficult to police the quality of these products. All drugs (including legal and medicinal ones) carry a risk of an adverse reaction, so plenty of people will still die from using them.

dhc

|

16:07, 16 April 08

|

Karma Score: 1367



3. The Amount of tax that the government could place on drugs would bring the NHS out of its neverending slump.
# 1

It is possible to argue that with the legalisation of all drugs, people that never considered taking them would try them, and possibly become addicted. But, as argued in a separate point much of the coolness would be taken away. One of the major benefits to legalisation would be the enormous amount of tax that could be put on the legal, and purer substances. The NHS would not struggle with an overflow of drug addicts; the money made in tax would cover not only improvements in hospitals, but also improvements in education making training to become a nurse or practitioner a far more achievable vocation, improving livelihoods and therefore the economy. There will always be drugs; the War on Drugs is lost, why not have the state make money out of it too?

dhc

|

16:35, 16 April 08

|

Karma Score: 1367


# 2

If drugs were legal and more easily accessible then the NHS would have to spend even more money treating the health problems that they cause. At the moment, the NHS concentrates on programmes to help people break out of drug addiction, like the provision of methodone. However, if drug use became legal they would have less of an incentive to do so, meaning that more people would suffer the ill health that results from long term drug use.

dhc

|

16:35, 16 April 08

|

Karma Score: 1367



4. The amount of illegal activity associated with smuggling would come to a halt.
# 1

If drugs were legally imported in, as many brands of cigarettes and alcohol are, what become of the smuggling business? It would decrease incredibly if not eliminated by the fact that drugs are available legally. Why wants to go down a dark alley to meet an almost stranger and buy drugs cut with crap, when it's possible to buy them as one would cigarettes?

dhc

|

16:41, 16 April 08

|

Karma Score: 1367



5. Drugs education could be true and accurate instead of falsely terrifying.
# 1

School drugs education is typically biased towards explaining the dangers of drugs and against describing any potential benefits or advantages. All drugs are treated as dangerous and to be avoided. Children who try cannabis, for example, quickly stop believing anything they are told because they find cannabis enjoyable and relaxing. If drugs were legal, education could be truthful and explain the real advantages and dangers of drug use. Even better it might promote the sensible use of drugs instead of encouraging more abuse.

admin

|

07:52, 05 August 08

|

Karma Score: 14


# 2

Schools spend lots of time trying to educate young people about sexual and health issues in the hope that they will look after themselves and be safer. Yet in reality, the problems of obesity, teenage pregnancy and STDs continue to escalate. Why should we expect drugs to be any different- a more 'balanced' education programme would not be enough to stop drug abuse, especially when we take the addictive nature of drugs into consideration.

admin

|

07:52, 05 August 08

|

Karma Score: 14



1. Laws Against Drugs Use Are There For A Reason!
# 1

Getting rid of laws against drug use would be idiotic. The majority of people agree with drug laws and like it or not, they work! If a Government suddenly got rid of drug use laws, imagine what message the message people would get from this. People would view this as a green light to take drugs.

admin

|

09:50, 06 April 09

|

Karma Score: 14


# 2

People have been taking drugs, which our government deems illegal, for as long as there have been people. 11 million people take illegal drugs in the UK, despite their being illegal.

The government justifies drugs laws with two main arguments: cost and health.

The government tells us that drugs crime costs the tax payer £16 billion per year. If we look at where this money is spent we find that the majority of the expense comes from the fact that drugs are illegal. It is spent on paying the Police to arrest people on drugs charges, it is spent on paying the court service to hear the trials and it is spent on paying the prison service to keep people in prison. If we were to repeal the misuse of drugs act 1971 and replace it with a system of regulation, education and quality control the tax payer would save £16 billion per year.

The government paints a picture of illegal drugs beign evil and bad for our health although 11 million people manage to take illegal drugs in this country. The greatest health risks come from the fact that there is no regulation of the system, there is no education as to safe methods of use and there is no quality control.

Alcohol and tobacco are proven to be more harmful to health than many illegal drugs (there are too many to mention individually here).

The example set in countries such as Holland shows that legalising drugs does not mean that the country will grind to a halt while everyone has a go. It does not change peoples attitudes towards them, similarly some people choose not to drink alcohol or smoke tobacco, some do, legality is not an issue here.

Cannabis, for example, is proven to have many health benefits. It is proven to help relieve the symptoms of chronic pain, arthritis, spinal chord injuries, glaucoma and parkinsons to name but a few.

For the reasons given above, drugs laws do not work and never will.

Jessica

|

16:29, 09 October 09

|

Karma Score: 3



2. A Drugs Economy
# 1

As a result of the legalisation of drug use, an economy of drugs trafficking and creation would result. Countries which already have drugs problems would be encouraged to mass produce and traffic drugs to Britain, despite it most likely being illegal in their own country.

admin

|

09:56, 06 April 09

|

Karma Score: 14



Loading...