- + Rahina joined Debatewise
- + Jdickins voted on a point for the debate The death penalty should be reinstated in the UK
- + Menareangrynow voted on the debate Are women superior to men?
- + Murphy Becca joined Debatewise
- + Lisa1985 joined Debatewise
- + Qualaypak joined Debatewise
- + Rhoda Doku joined Debatewise
- + Terri Re joined Debatewise
- + Jdickins voted on a point for the debate 1-child policy for every single country in the world!
- + Dillas2 joined Debatewise
- + Garbypizzaro joined Debatewise
- + Zedspeni Asype joined Debatewise
- + Moilt Evomot joined Debatewise
- + Alexis Skitini voted on a point for the debate Legalise drugs worldwide
- + Jdickins voted on a point for the debate The death penalty should be reinstated in the UK
- + Ll Blynch voted on the debate Are ASBOs Effective?
- + Ll Blynch voted on a point for the debate Are ASBOs Effective?
- + Elefweiree Law joined Debatewise
- + Ll Blynch voted on a point for the debate Are ASBOs Effective?
- + Jdickins joined Debatewise
- + Jdickins voted on a point for the debate The death penalty should be reinstated in the UK
- + Jdickins edited the debate 1-child policy for every single country in the world!
- + Ll Blynch edited the debate Are ASBOs Effective?
- + Jdickins voted on a point for the debate The death penalty should be reinstated in the UK
DO PROTESTERS HAVE ANY EFFECT ON INTERANATIONAL NEGOTIATIONS?
All major conferences about development or climate issues since seattle in 1999 have protests around them. This is especially true where there are going to be the leaders of the rich world comming. The Copenhagen conference has been no exception, 968 demonstraters were detained on saturday and more than 200 activists were detained today. Once the leaders arrive and the crunch time for any deal approaches the demonstrations will only get bigger and there may be more direct action. Does this help force leaders towards a deal? Does taking more direct action make more difference than peaceful protests.
Do protesters have any effect on interanational negotiations?
Yes, because... Shows people feel passionately about the issue.
Being willing to make the time and pay the cost of going to a two week conference shows commitment and dedication to attempting to persuade the world to halt climate change by limiting emissions. This passion can affect the delegates too as the presence of people who care about what happens puts pressure on the delegates to give them at least some of what they have come for.
The delegates should not be affected in any way by those who are outside. They should simply be representing the national interest to the best of their ability regardless of any distractions.
Vote on this point: Shows people feel passionately about the issue.
See history of changes to this point
Do protesters have any effect on interanational negotiations?
Yes, because... Shows there is critical scrutiny.
It is often the NGOs that are among the most vocal critics of governments while still being a respectable and authoritative voice. They can counter government attempts to claim not so much needs to be done by publishing 'official' statistics. They criticise when governments are not doing enough or if they go back on a promise, this helps prevent backsliding both during and after a conference and commitment.
They may provide a voice giving an alternative view but they are not effective. Governments regularly dont keep to their commitments and no ammount of heckling by protesters and NGOs will make them.
Vote on this point: Shows there is critical scrutiny.
See history of changes to this point
Do protesters have any effect on interanational negotiations?
No, because... Only a tiny minority
Leaders should pay attention to any protest no matter how big or small, if there are only a minority in Copenhagen they represent a much bigger number who could not come or who agree with the protesters but do not have the same passion to to express their views in protests.
No matter how many protesters there are in Copenhagen they are only going to be a tiny proportion of the world's population. Any individual country can easily say that these protesters do not represent the people in their country. leaders of democracies should pay no attention to them as that would mean they were paying attention to a tiny minority not their country as a whole. Big protests back at home should be more effective.
Vote on this point: Only a tiny minority
See history of changes to this point
Do protesters have any effect on interanational negotiations?
No, because... Becoming too common?
There is no option but to keep protesting. If leaders retreat behind fencing then the protests need to be bigger and louder to be noticed.
These large protests at conferences and the often associated violence and arrests have been happening at too many conferences and events. The leaders retreat behind barbed wire and ignore the protesters while the people seeing the protests over the TV think 'not again' rather than looking at the reasons behind the protests.
Point 1. Shows people feel passionately about the issue.
Being willing to make the time and pay the cost of going to a two week conference shows commitment and dedication to attempting to persuade the world to halt climate change by limiting emissions. This passion can affect the delegates too as the presence of people who care about what happens puts pressure on the delegates to give them at least some of what they have come for.
The delegates should not be affected in any way by those who are outside. They should simply be representing the national interest to the best of their ability regardless of any distractions.
I feel that despite the strength of protesting in forms of boycotting, sit-ins, and other acts of revolution in the past (mostly in the 60's) it is not as effective today. Back in the 1960's presidents and other government leaders were extremely concerned about how the public looked at them. Now it is simple for persons to get elected to high government offices and barely do anything for the people yet still get re-elected. Now, if a government official wanted the public to get off of his or her back, they would respond to the people rioting. But honestly, protests now are not as strong and severe as they used to be. They're not as effective anymore but it's cute.
Point 2. Shows there is critical scrutiny.
It is often the NGOs that are among the most vocal critics of governments while still being a respectable and authoritative voice. They can counter government attempts to claim not so much needs to be done by publishing 'official' statistics. They criticise when governments are not doing enough or if they go back on a promise, this helps prevent backsliding both during and after a conference and commitment.
They may provide a voice giving an alternative view but they are not effective. Governments regularly dont keep to their commitments and no ammount of heckling by protesters and NGOs will make them.
Point 1. Only a tiny minority
No matter how many protesters there are in Copenhagen they are only going to be a tiny proportion of the world's population. Any individual country can easily say that these protesters do not represent the people in their country. leaders of democracies should pay no attention to them as that would mean they were paying attention to a tiny minority not their country as a whole. Big protests back at home should be more effective.
Leaders should pay attention to any protest no matter how big or small, if there are only a minority in Copenhagen they represent a much bigger number who could not come or who agree with the protesters but do not have the same passion to to express their views in protests.
Point 2. Becoming too common?
These large protests at conferences and the often associated violence and arrests have been happening at too many conferences and events. The leaders retreat behind barbed wire and ignore the protesters while the people seeing the protests over the TV think 'not again' rather than looking at the reasons behind the protests.
There is no option but to keep protesting. If leaders retreat behind fencing then the protests need to be bigger and louder to be noticed.