Modified:
09 Oct 2009
by Booji
Vote totals:
Yes:
0%
No:
0%
Neutral:
0%
Subscribe to This Debate
You are not currently subscribed to this debate.
Misc Debates
Subscribe to Newsletter
Tell a Friend
(Use commas to separate)
DEBATE: SHOULD MI5 BEING MORE OPEN ABOUT THE PAST HELP US TO TRUST THEM ON THE WAR ON TERROR?
Posted by: xhelenx
Karma:
356
MI5 has released an official biography, The Defence of the Realm: The Authorised History of MI5, of the organisation. The book is written to help throw some light on the organisation during the cold war. This is obviously to show the service opening up a bit and to help the public to trust them on current operations when we are increasingly sceptical of the war on terror. But does the knowledge of the vast archives that were held on people in Britain really make us trust such an organisation more?
Executive Summary
Join The Debate
All the Yes points
All the No points
SHOULD MI5 BEING MORE OPEN ABOUT THE PAST HELP US TO TRUST THEM ON THE WAR ON TERROR?
Understanding MI5 allows us to understand our country’s security
Being able to understand both successful and failed attempts by the MI5 shows us that the organisation strives to keep Britain secure. As a history of the organisation from start to beginning, 100 years of MI5, this book will allow the public to see the MI5 as it is rather than a representation offered by rumours and films. With a true description of the organisation the public can truly make decisions on MI5 as a useful oragnisation or not. Opening up in this way means that the public can make their own decisions whether to read the book and can put their trust in the organisation due to its exposure.
The only understanding that publishing details of the MI5 and thier exploits would bring is understanding that the information they hold is not top secret! Surely the whole point of MI5 is that the information they hold they keep a secret from us for our own protection. With this information being published surely all future exploits by MI5 will be a failure, people will know their tactics. Let us not forget that the people MI5 are investigating are in this country aswell. A detailed understanding of how the MI5 has operated in the past will be an invaluable for future MI5 targets escaping their system.
What do you think? Vote on this point below.
SHOULD MI5 BEING MORE OPEN ABOUT THE PAST HELP US TO TRUST THEM ON THE WAR ON TERROR?
Having archives freely available allows the public to make up their own minds on the organisation
Giving people access to the files and archives on people and activities regarding MI5 allows Britain to stand tall as a democracy. It allows us to see how the government work with such organisations and how they influence the organisation. As the book is a centenary text it shows the changing roles of MI5 throughout different party leaderships as well as different wars and confrontational matters. This means that we can re-evaluate ideas on the organisation and see its governmental influence as well as how it is influenced by the government. The power is being handed back to the public and allowing us to make our own decisions on the faith that we put in MI5.
SHOULD MI5 BEING MORE OPEN ABOUT THE PAST HELP US TO TRUST THEM ON THE WAR ON TERROR?
Showing the History shows how the organisation has and will change
With the book being a biography of the organisation the MI5 is showing how it has changed and will continue to change with the times. The success of the organisation through World War II and the Cold War shows the development of success. The development of technology has allowed the organisation to stay secretive in its actions however it has meant that the history can be revealed without affecting current issues regarding MI5. Although the war on terror is different the change of the organisation with time shows that we can trust MI5 to develop and continue keeping Britain secure. This means that we can trust the organisation will adapt for the war on terror as it has for other wars involving Britain.
It is a bizarre argument that a secret organisation can 'earn' the publics confidence by releasing all their information. The whole concept is baffeling. The fact that the public are not aware of how MI5 operate currently is proof enough that the MI5 are doing their job at keeping information secret. Releasing information about themselves should lower public confidence in them, not improve it.
What do you think? Vote on this point below.
SHOULD MI5 BEING MORE OPEN ABOUT THE PAST HELP US TO TRUST THEM ON THE WAR ON TERROR?
MI5 still has the ability to censor and edit the book that is being written by Christopher Andrews
Although MI5 is releasing a biography written by Christopher Andrews, a Cambridge historian, the book is still an official and authorised work. This means that MI5 has the ability to omit details and to manipulate Andrews’ writing, encouraging the reader to place a certain amount of trust on the book and subsequently MI5. It has been acknowledged that Andrews' opinion has not been edited within the work, however the authorisation of the book by MI5 shows that they have some influence. As Andrews’ is an outside academic that researches MI5 activities and has been allowed to write this book it seems that MI5 will have had a choice in the matter. As MI5 chose the author, was able to edit and the book has consistently been in the hands of MI5 we cannot fully trust the book. Thus we cannot fully trust the organisation just through the release of this book.
SHOULD MI5 BEING MORE OPEN ABOUT THE PAST HELP US TO TRUST THEM ON THE WAR ON TERROR?
It is a secretive service and should stay that way
MI5 has always been seen as a secretive service, although it is officially a security service, its early ventures into seeking out German spies relied on its secretive agents. The creation of MI5 was to protect Britain and this organisation has continued to work to help seek and establish plots of terrorism against Britain. With the release of the facts and figures of MI5 the trust of the service will be diminished. The exposure of such a large security service means that it is placing itself in a vulnerable state and open to attacks for its practices. In this sense we will not be able to trust the company, as it will be itself exposed for what it is and may make the country insecure opposing its true duty.
SHOULD MI5 BEING MORE OPEN ABOUT THE PAST HELP US TO TRUST THEM ON THE WAR ON TERROR?
Exposing archives will aggravate past ideas and those affected by actions of MI5
Any personal files and actions taken by MI5 may aggravate past rebellions and those personally affected by the organisation's actions. These exposures of personal files can lead Britain to turn against the organisation rather than trust it. Although the book includes both successes and failures of MI5 those that were successful actions will be both praised and disparaged. It is these disparages that create a larger impact on the trust of the organisation. Britain will highlight the areas of failure but also some of the successes may cause concern and rebellion therefore leading to a distrust of MI5.
Vote on the overall debate: Should MI5 being more open about the past help us to trust them on the war on terror?
What do you think? Vote on this debate below.

xhelenx
|15:48, 08 October 09
|Karma Score: 356
Applaud
Quote
Flag
Reply
LLBlynch
|13:15, 09 October 09
|Karma Score: 2699
Applaud
Quote
Flag
Reply
xhelenx
|15:49, 08 October 09
|Karma Score: 356
Applaud
Quote
Flag
Reply
xhelenx
|15:52, 08 October 09
|Karma Score: 356
Applaud
Quote
Flag
Reply
LLBlynch
|13:19, 09 October 09
|Karma Score: 2699
Applaud
Quote
Flag
Reply
xhelenx
|15:57, 08 October 09
|Karma Score: 356
Applaud
Quote
Flag
Reply
xhelenx
|15:58, 08 October 09
|Karma Score: 356
Applaud
Quote
Flag
Reply
xhelenx
|16:01, 08 October 09
|Karma Score: 356
Applaud
Quote
Flag
Reply